To: Mark Hafner, City Manager
From: Trish Sinel, Senior Planner
Subject:
Title
Consider a resolution approving three variances to Section 8.03 of the Unified Development Code for a Final Plat for Lot 1, Block A, Mitchell Estates, being 0.56-acres located on the west side of Randol Mill Avenue, zoned Single Family 36,000 Square-Foot lots (SF-36) and currently addressed as 1420 Randol Mill Avenue. Distinguished Custom Homes, Applicant; Edward and Shearon Mitchell, Owners. (P-21-0028)
Body
Request:
The Applicant is requesting three variances to the lot size regulations of the SF-36 Zoning district, specified in Section 8.03 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), for a Final Plat.
Why Action is Required:
Section 2.07 of the UDC states a variance or deviation may be granted when special conditions exist that prevent the strict compliance of the Code.
Background:
Prior to 2013, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) acquired almost half of this tract for the expansion of FM 1938 (Randol Mill Avenue). The existing house was demolished and the remainder undeveloped.
In 2013, an application for three variances was submitted to and approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment by a previous land owner. Based on the proposed house plan, the three variances approved were:
1. A 7’ privacy fence in front of the main structure
2. A reduction of the front yard setback to 20’
3. An increase in lot coverage to 57% from 50%
However, the building permit wasn’t issued, so the variances expired.
The new Applicant (with a new house plan) is now requesting three UDC variances to the final plat due to lot constraints. These variances will result in a lot and building envelope that more closely meet the zoning requirements for SF-36 than the three 2013 variances.
Variance Requests:
The Applicant is requesting the following variances to the lot size regulation of the SF-36 zoning district:
1. A 119.2’ lot depth average (versus the required 200’ requirement)
2. A 24,393 square-foot lot area (versus the required 36,000 square-foot lot minimum)
3. A 25’ front setback (versus the 60’ setback required on thoroughfares)
SF-36) Zoning District Standards:
Size of Lots
1. Minimum Lot Area - Thirty-six thousand (36,000) square-feet. Variance needed for 24,393 square-feet.
2. Minimum Lot Width - One hundred fifty feet (150'). (MEETS)
3. Minimum Lot Depth - Two hundred feet (200’). Variance needed for average lot depth of 119.2 feet.
Setbacks
1. Minimum Front Yard - Sixty feet (60'). Variance needed for 25 feet (25’).
2. Minimum Side Yard - Exterior, fifteen feet (15'); interior, none; thoroughfare, thirty feet (30'). (MEETS)
3. Minimum Rear Yard - Fifteen feet (15'). (MEETS)
Proposed Plat Development Standards:
• Lot Area - 24,393 square-feet (variance requested)
• Lot Width - 207.49 feet
• Lot Depth - 105.15 feet’ (north end) and 133.25 feet (south end) for an average lot depth of 119.2 feet (variance requested)
• Front Setback (east) - 25 feet (variance requested)
• Side Yard Setback (south) - 15 feet
• Side Yard Setback (north) - 15 feet
• Rear Setback (west)- 15 feet
Citizen Input:
Variances to a final plat of an existing lot of record do not require a Public Hearing; however, comments can be made during Persons to be Heard.
Summary:
According to section 2.07 (A)(2) of the Unified Development Code, the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council shall take into account the nature of the proposed
use of land involved and existing uses of the land in the vicinity, the number of persons
who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, and the probable effect of such
variance upon traffic conditions and upon the public health, safety, convenience, and
welfare in the vicinity. No variance shall be granted unless the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council finds:
a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that the strict application of the provisions of this Code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
b. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or injurious to other properties in the area.
c. That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other lands in the area in accordance with the provisions of this Code.
d. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a violation of any other valid ordinance of the City of Keller.
e. That strict compliance with the regulations, and/or that the purpose of the regulations will be served to a greater extent by the alternative proposal.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
On September 28, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the item.
Alternatives:
The City Council has the following options when considering variances to a final plat:
§ Approve as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
§ Approve with conditions
§ Table the agenda item to a specific date with clarification of intent and purpose.
§ Deny
Supporting Documents:
- Maps
- Staff Attachment A - Application and Information
- Staff Attachment B - Plat Package